Case in Point: Donnalyn Bartolome vs. Jose Hallorina Cyberbullying + Online Libel RA 10627 RA 10175

Law students may find it interesting to launch a moot court exercise on the percolating exchange between Donnalyn Bartolome and Jose Hallorina. The case would evolve around cyberbullying (RA 10672) and online libel (RA 10175).

When does a portion of one's private life become open for public consumption?

When does the line between helping and meddling begin and end?

Is justice served best by radio commentators and social experiment producers doing public service? When do they become liable to short circuiting due process, ehen it gets to that?

This reminds us of the incident involving a teacher (Melita Limjuco), Raffy Tulfo (of Isumbong Mo Kay Tulfo), and a child's legal guardians. Should a teacher just quit work, or get her license revoked just for allegedly doing harm to a child?

Back to Jose's exposé -- which indirectly hints that Donnalyn has not been supporting her grandmother's sister -- where do we draw the line between trying to help and playing god?

This is a reaction and parody video of characters inspired by YouTube personalities. Welcome to the world of fanfiction!

_____________

Backgroynd Music: On the Run
By: David Fesliyan

Donnalyn Bartolome,Jose Hallorina,RA 10672,RA 10175,cyberbullying,online libel,Chad Kinis,pera o bayot,moot court,part 3,pinabayaang lola,Kadenang Pinto,sawsawan ng bayan,sikat na youtube,