According to reports in recent months, the British Army is said to be pushing for one of the Royal Navy’s brand new super carriers to be leased out to the US in a bid to garner extra cash for military funding. A Sunday Times’ report revealed that decision makers in the UK’s military brass could flog either HMS Prince of Wales or HMS Queen Elizabeth. The US, which is currently embroiled in a huge naval standoff in the South China Sea, could take on one of the ships in yet another expansion of its fleet.
This comes despite the Government’s promises to maintain the size of the armed forces.
HMS Queen Elizabeth visited the US last year, with Tony Radakin, the First Sea Lord and UK Chief of Naval Staff, claiming that the two allies’ naval forces could be closely integrated.
All the information in this video came from the:
► Thumbnail/Video just For Illustration
► Before Comment , Please connect your tongue to your brain!
► This video is made under fair use policy, also this material is made from public published domain for people with hearing and seeing disability.
Credits: Petty Officer 2nd Class Anthony J Rivera, Petty Officer 2nd Class Jason Isaacs, Ultimate US Military
• Watch more videos:
Tensions with China: U.S. looks to Deploy New Missiles to Asia
US Navy Awards Contract Modification to HII for CVN-74 RCOH planning
Rising Tensions in South China Sea cast Shadow over ASEAN summit
This Is How the U.S. Air Force Would Fight China
Why US Air Force Needs this DEADLY Fighter Jet?
#British #HMS
DISCLAIMER: Information, Facts or Opinion expressed in this Video are Presented as Sources and do not reflects views of Ultimate US Military and hence, Ultimate US Military is not liable or responsible for the same. The Sources are responsible for accuracy, Completeness, suitaibility and Validity of any information in this Documentary.
Title 17, US Code (Sections 107-118 of the copyright law, Act 1976):
All media in this video is used for purpose of review & commentary under terms of fair use.
All footage, & images used belong to their respective companies.
0 Comments